Mountain View, CA, October 20, 2012 --(PR.com
)-- The first Roundtable in the discourse on network-centric performance management saw experts debating fundamental questions, such as the definition of network-centric, and what is driving the need to examine performance management so minutely. Opinions were heard from Aamer Akhter of Cisco, Benoit Claise, OAM Area Director at the IETF, Vikas Trehan, SVP Alliances, InfoVista, Gordon Bolt, VP Engineering, OPNET.
Dr. Vishal Sharma, Principal, Metanoia, Inc. summed it up when he said, “Network-centric performance management is the management of network parameters and activities that are not tied to specific applications, but rather are needed to keep the network running satisfactorily. E.g. sync distribution, impairment detection, fault isolation and notification, and adequate levels of delay, jitter, loss, and availability (perhaps defined by some average of the requirements of applications typically running on the network).”
Network-centric performance management is, in a sense, the first step to meeting the goal of application performance management. If the underlying network is not operating correctly, application-level performance is surely impaired.
It turns out that while there are many tools and techniques for performance management (advanced OAM, better sampling & aggregation methods, synthetic transactions, support in vendor systems, and sophisticated software), it is still very tricky to answer fundamental questions such as: Where did a performance problem originate? Who is responsible for it? How do we go about fixing it? Indeed, there are a slew of deeper questions around these fundamental issues.
The current initiative has assembled key players from the carrier eco-system to discuss, debate, and answer important questions in this area, such as:
i) What are key advances in performance monitoring of fundamental network-level activities that enable the proper & efficient running of a network?
ii) Which advances are designed to enable proactive performance management?
iii) Where are we on the ownership and sharing of performance data?
iv) How does fault isolation across boundaries work? How is fault notification done? How does one determine and assign “responsibility” to the liable network segment/operator?
To participate in this engaging dialog, and to interact with the distinguished experts on our Roundtables and on the panel, do register now at bit.ly/QFrnaQ, and let them have your top questions in this area, so they can address them in this discourse.
Metanoia, Inc. (www.metanoia-inc.com) has been providing its expertise to players across the full telecom ecosystem (chip & semiconductor vendors, system vendors, operators & carriers, technology houses, and software/planning tool vendors) since 2001, and helping them solve complex problems. Our contributions have spanned the strategy for, and the analysis, design, and architecture of, systems, networks, and services, to the optimization of the equipment and networks deploying them.
Our contributions have allowed a marquee list of clients (ranging from fast-paced innovative startups and international leaders, to giants in the US Fortune 1000) across 4 continents to accelerate technology design and development or network design and deployment, speed-up time-to-market, slash learning cycles, master complex technologies, and enhance customer-interaction and revenues, yielding benefits many times their investments in our services.
In short, we have been Powering Leadership Through InnovationTM To learn more please contact us at email@example.com or at +1-650-641-0082. Metanoia will be delighted to collaborate on efficiently solving your problem, and enhancing savings and revenue for you.